DCCCD homepage
 
 
BOARD OF TRUSTEES' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1998-99 Access Report
 
Goal 5 Access: The DCCCD student body will reflect the demographic characteristics of the Dallas County adult population and will persist in achieving their individual educational goals.

The following District-wide indicators are reported:

 Findings

Student and Dallas County Adult Populations

The fall 1998 combined credit and non-credit student body mirrors the Hispanic and African-American populations, is lower than Anglo and higher than Asian populations.

Approximately 9% of the Dallas County adult population receive credit or non-credit instruction from the DCCCD each year.

The student body contains a slightly lower percent of individuals academically disadvantaged and about the same percent economically disadvantaged as found in the Dallas area.

Fall to Spring Retention Rates

Retention of credit students from fall 1997 to spring 1998 is consistent with previous fall to spring retention rates with full-time students having the highest rate (75%) followed by those enrolled 6-11 hours (62%) and others enrolled 1-5 hours (48%).

Using a success rate defined as retained students plus non-retained students in good academic standing, the success rate for fall 1997 students was 87.5%. This rate includes the positive forms of attrition such as graduation, university transfer and/or personal goal attainment.

Discussion

As noted, retention rates have been fairly constant from year to year. Research1 indicates such consistency is generally the norm and that the amount a college is able to change its retention rate may be somewhat limited due to influential factors (i.e. low income level, student pre-college educational preparation, etc.) beyond control of the college.

However, there are areas (i.e. advising, scheduling, etc.) colleges can address to improve retention. For example, the ECC Retention Committee Marketing Plan calls for the development of a college resource guide for faculty to use to advise students. The RLC Summer High School Scholarship encourages students to enroll the summer after high school and continue in subsequent semesters by assisting with tuition if certain criteria are met. Students at CVC are telephoned by peers and reminded of early registration times for the upcoming semester. MVC counselors meet with students who are on probation to provide guidance for improving academic performance.

Improving course completion rates indirectly improves retention rates. At CVC, several
English courses are scheduled such that students who miss one class can attend another to
make up what was missed. This has reduced such course withdrawal rates to less than 10%. EFC and RLC have "delayed-starting" classes so that late registered students begin class together rather than joining a class that has already met several times. A study of BHC developmental reading/writing students led to the development of numerous strategies, which include increasing communication with students through contact prior to the start of class and then follow-up via telephone calls or letters to students who miss class.

These few examples are not comprehensive but serve to illustrate the creative and varied retention improvement efforts being undertaken at the college, program and classroom levels.
 

Ethnicity of Fall 1998 Students & Estimated Dallas County Adult Population
 
 
Anglo
Hispanic
African Am.
Other
DCCCD Students
52%
19%
17%
12%
Est. Dallas County Pop.
60%
18%
18%
4%
 
Fall to Spring Credit Student Success Rates
 
Fall 97 to Spring 98 
BHC
CVC
EFC
ECC
MVC
 NLC
RLC
District
Total Students 
7,657
2,712
7,986
4,382
5,424
6,946
12,855
47,152
Returned
59%
56%
59%
57%
59%
57%
57%
61%
Left in Good Standing
29%
29%
29%
29%
28%
31%
31%
27%
Success Rate
88%
85%
88%
86%
87%
88%
88%
88%
 
Notes:
1 "Predictive Model of Retention Rate," by Frank Wyman, Community College Review,Volume 25, No.1
Estimated Dallas County adult population= average 1995 & 2000 forecasts with .5 migration scenario
The District retention rate includes students enrolled in the fall at one DCCCD college who return to a different DCCCD college as retained, while college rates do not.
Left in Good Standing = non-returning student had grade point average of 2.0 or higher
Data Sources: Student Master File, Texas A&M, Dept of Rural Sociology
 
Prepared by District Office of Research, November 1998


1998-99 Board Indicator Reports